Sunday, December 22, 2024

Pensioners start legal action over winter fuel cut

Must read

The policy has sparked fury across the country

Pensioners protesting cuts to the winter fuel allowance
Pensioners protesting cuts to the winter fuel allowance (Image: Getty Images)

Two British pensioners are seeking to take the UK and Scottish governments to court over the cut to the winter fuel payment. Peter and Florence Fanning, of Coatbridge, North Lanarkshire, have raised proceedings against the UK Work and Pensions Secretary and the Scottish Government over the policy.

Following Labour’s election win, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the winter fuel payment – which had previously been universal – will only be available to those on pension credit or other means-tested benefits this year due to financial woes. Earlier this week, dozens of Merseyside pensioners braved torrential rain outside the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool to protest the policy. One sign read: “Scouse pensioners have warm hearts. Starmer’s heart is cold as ice. Labour not welcome in Liverpool.”


READ MORE: Sainsbury’s set to open new Merseyside storeREAD MORE: Man was taken to court by council but he’d done nothing wrong

The decision by the UK government to cut the allowance led to the Scottish Government to follow suit. The judicial review – which has been raised at the Court of Session – now requires a judge’s approval to move to a hearing on the merits, with the Govan Law Centre seeking to expedite both the case and its application for legal aid to ensure a decision can be handed down before the winter.

The case asks the court to rule on whether the decision was unlawful, which would then allow the petitioners to ask the court to, in effect, set aside the policy and restore the winter fuel payment to all. Speaking at a press conference in Edinburgh on Thursday, Mr Fanning, 73, said: “We intend to sue both the London and Scottish governments, since both are guilty through action and inaction, of damaging the welfare of pensioners.


Sign up to FREE email alerts from The Merseyside Report

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info

“We are hoping to be successful, given the manifest injustice involved, however, my work as a trade unionist and shop steward has taught me that some battles are worth fighting regardless of the outcome – I believe this is one such battle.”

The case’s argument rests on the accusation both governments failed to adequately consult with those of pension age on the change and did not release an equality impact assessment on the changes. A freedom of information request revealed an abridged version of such an assessment had been carried out by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), with the UK Government arguing a full study was not required.

Former first minister and current Alba Party leader Alex Salmond was instrumental in putting the Fannings in touch with the Govan Law Centre ahead of the action being raised. Speaking at the press conference on Thursday, Mr Salmond said every person in Scotland “should be grateful” to the Fannings for raising the action, which he said should have been taken forward by the Scottish Government in the first instance.


Pointing to an analysis by the Labour Party in 2017 – which suggested 4,000 people could die if the winter fuel payment was cut – Mr Salmond claimed it would be “reprehensible” for the UK Government not to undertake an equality impact assessment because such a figure would be made public.

He added: “The Scottish Government, instead of meekly accepting this, should have challenged it. They should have stood up for pensioners and stood up for the people as opposed to meekly toeing the line that was coming from Westminster.”

The former first minister added that while it would be “the most enormous humiliation” for the governments to lose the case: “I wonder is that as bad as the humiliation if the health service in Scotland and England can cope with the health impacts of what they’re doing?”


Rachel Moon, the instructing solicitor and a partner at Govan Law Centre, said: “Quite simply, (government) should have considered this rigorously. This policy and the decisions taken affect those with protected characteristics, including age and disability, and it affects 10 million people.”

A spokeswoman for the UK Government said: “We are committed to supporting pensioners, with millions set to see their full new state pension rise by £1,700 this Parliament through our commitment to the triple lock.

“Given the dire state of the public finances we have inherited, it’s right we target support to those who need it most. Over a million pensioners will still receive the winter fuel payment, while many others will also benefit from the £150 warm home discount to help with their energy bills over winter.”

Latest article